Published On: Mon, Feb 4th, 2013

The Udinese selling model – Is it the right way for them to operate?

If you dream of becoming the Javier Zanetti or Francesco Totti of , you might as well stay mediocre.

Any player that stands out of the group will invariably have his name listed on the mercato as made evident in recent years by the selling of Gaetano D’Agostino, , in 2010; , Gokhan Inler, in 2011; , Mauricio Isla, in 2012; and Pablo Armero this past month. One of the few exceptions to the norm is the 35 year old, back to back copacannoiere, .

Despite cashing-in on many good players, coach has steered the club to impressive heights – the Zebrette finished third in 2011-12, and narrowly lost against in the two legged Champions League qualifying play offs. In the 2010-11 season, the Bianconeri finished fourth with a total of 66 points – a club record.

The Udine outfit might have struggled to establish themselves as a ‘big club’ given their transfer policy, but off the field, they have been exemplary in balancing their books. In fact, Udinese are one of the few clubs in Europe and the only club in the top flight of Italian football that currently meet the requirements of the financial fair play.

Profit from transfers

12/13 Revenue – 36.200.000 € Expenditure – 25.400.000 € Total = +10.800.000 €

11/12 Revenue – 70.250.000 € Expenditure – 21.111.000 € Total = +49.139.000 €

10/11 Revenue – 30.290.000 € Expenditure – 13.550.000 € Total = +16.740.000 €

09/10 Revenue – 36.150.000 € Expenditure – 18.333.000 € Total = +17.817.000 €

08/09 Revenue – 34.900.000 € Expenditure – 20.100.000 € Total = +14.800.000 €

According to a report published in June, 2012, Giampaolo Pozzo’s (the owner of Udinese, Granada and ) club made a profit of nine million euros in the 2011-12 season, with revenues that exceeded € 60 million. Television rights constituted 56.4 percent of the total revenue – not too much by Italian standards – reflecting the self-financing capacity of the club as ticket revenues are diminutive in Serie A, as compared to other countries.

The club owns the rights of about a hundred athletes, many of whom have been loaned out in a bid to provide them with regular playing time. As of June 2012, the total market value of the 36 players in the squad was € 102 million. Informal estimates suggest that the club was able to add a €46 million value to their players in the past couple of years.

The total revenue in 2011-2012 totaled € 63,4 million, an improvement of € 8.9 from the previous year. Net income including TV rights from playing in the Europa league was € 5.3 million, while sponsorship deals generated another € 5 million.

Television rights amounted to € 35.8 million, an increment of € 1.3 million from the previous year. In the current season, this figure is expected to rise to € 41 million.

Management costs shot up to € 91.2 million from €76 million in 2011, but were partly canceled out by a significant growth in capital gains from €41.9 million to €57.5 million, thanks to some high profile transfers.

The report also mentions a loss of €7 million incurred on transfer deficits of some players, as well as €20 million depreciation on player values, which reflects the club’s far-sighted planning. However, net gain from player transfers was almost €50 million in 2011.

To sum, net profit after tax was €8.8 million, a sharp increase from €2.9 in 2011. The success of the management’s strategy, which focuses on player scouting and development, technical risk reduction, careful use of the resources and synergy between the operational areas is unquestionable.

Fans might be venting out their frustration over the loss of their star players and the lack of silverware as a result of compromising quality for profit, but for a club of Udinese’s stature, with modest ambitions, emphasizing on long term sustainability is the right approach.

Talks of a new Stadio Friuli have been ongoing for some time, and if the Friuliani were to move to their own home, it would ensure them the right platform to aim for trophies.

New Stadio Friuli

Follow Swarup Pokhrel on Twitter: @argeniter

Displaying 5 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. AP says:

    I really dislike Udinese because they barely use italian players. The team contributes nothing to the prestige of the italian league or to the italian national team.

  2. Frank says:

    RE AP:
    I don’t entirely disagree with you, but the backbone and identity of the team is Di Natale, Pinzi, and Domizzi. They supplement and sell talent around them. I believe the biggest factor in this model is that a talented Italian player is a known talent, therefore not likely to sign with Udinese.

  3. Ian Stout says:

    Not exactly financially fair for Udine to sell both of their best players to a single team, ie Asamoah+Isla-Juve. Udine can proceed on this path, but they should aim for Europa League, nothing more. They really wasted last year’s CL spot.

  4. Alberto says:

    Dear AP,
    Players to break in to the Italian team whilst playing at Udinese in recent years;
    Diego Fabbrini
    Fabio Quagliarella
    Simone Pepe
    Antonio DiNatale
    Gaetano D’Agostino
    Andrea Candreva
    Marco Motta

    Contributed nothing?

  5. Alberto says:

    Dear AP,
    Players to break in to the Italian team whilst playing at Udinese in recent years;
    Diego Fabbrini
    Fabio Quagliarella
    Simone Pepe
    Antonio DiNatale
    Gaetano D’Agostino
    Andrea Candreva
    Marco Motta
    Contributed nothing? Compared to who?
    Now they are building a top class youth academy full of Italian players.

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>


Podcast

Twitter

Advertisement

Visit us on Google+